comparison of enoxaparin sodium and standard heparin for hemodialysis anticoagulation

نویسندگان

samira tabiban rajaie cardiovascular medical and research center, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

khosrow rahbar nephrology department, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

behshid ghadrdoost rajaie cardiovascular medical and research center, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran; phd, rajaie cardiovascular medical and research center, mellat park, vali-e-asr avenue, p.o.box: 15745-1341, tehran 1996911151, iran. tel: +98-2123923017

narges sadat zahed nephrology department, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

چکیده

methods this randomized, crossover study with parallel design was conducted in 45 patients who required maintenance hemodialysis due to end-stage renal failure. four patients with known bleeding disorders, receiving anticoagulant drugs and receiving drugs which could affect heparin activity were excluded. all patients were randomly assigned to receive either enoxaparin sodium (0.7 mg/kg) or standard heparin for a duration of 12 weeks, after which patients were crossed over to another therapy for a further 12 weeks. enoxaparin sodium was administered 5 minutes before dialysis, injected into the arterial line pre- dialyser and heparin was administered 50 u/kg intravenously into the pre- dialyser arterial line followed by a maintenance dose of 1000 u per hour. background low-molecular-weight heparin (lmwh) has been suggested as an effective and safe anticoagulant for hemodialysis. the aim of our study was to investigate the effects of lmwh including minor bleeding, clotting formation in the extracorporeal dialysis circuit and their effect on the lipid profile in comparison with heparin. conclusions this study suggests that a single-dose of enoxaparin is an effective and convenient alternative to standard heparin. the recommended dose of this study in iranian patients is 0.25 mg/kg. results the mean age of the study population was of 65.18 (sd = 12.15) years. from these patients 22 (53%) were male and 19 (47%) were female. at the end of the first study phase, minor bleeding in patients receiving enoxaparin with dose of 0.25 mg/kg was significantly decreased in comparison to the patients receiving heparin (p: 0.03), although vascular compression time did not significantly differ between the heparin and enoxaparin groups. at the end of the second study phase, the enoxaparin group showed a significant increase in minor bleeding in comparison with the heparin group (p: 0. 04). in the enoxaparin arm, recurrent blood oozing from puncture sites led to the idea to reduce the dose of enoxaparin. after enoxaparin dose reduction, the frequency of minor bleeding decreased to 10% (from 19% to 10%) (p: 0.01). vascular compression time was not statistically different in heparin and enoxaparin at the end of study (p: 0.1). there were no significant changes in serum lipids with either anticoagulant neither at the end of the 12th week nor at the end of the 24th week.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) and standard unfractionated heparin for haemodialysis anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been suggested as providing safe, efficient, convenient and possibly more cost-effective anticoagulation for haemodialysis (HD) than unfractionated heparin, with fewer side-effects and possible benefits on uraemic dyslipidaemia. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study we compared the safety, clinical efficacy and cost effect...

متن کامل

Assessment of the Adminstration of Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Hemodialysis Anticoagulation in Comparison to Standard Unfractionated Heparin

Background and Aim of Study: The use of Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for hemodialysis anticoagulation has been proposed as effective and safe for hemodialysis (HD) anticoagulation as standard unfractionated heparin (UFH). The aim of our study was to assess the use of LMWH for hemodialysis anticoagulation in comparison to UFH, including hemorrhagic events and clotting of the extracorporea...

متن کامل

Anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with renal insufficiency: a comparison of bleeding rates with unfractionated heparin vs enoxaparin.

OBJECTIVES To compare the rates of bleeding complications in patients with renal insufficiency who receive anticoagulation therapy with the full therapeutic dose, unfractionated heparin (UFH), or with twice-daily enoxaparin. SETTING A 325-bed community teaching hospital. STUDY TYPE Retrospective cohort study. METHODS The medical records of all patients with renal insufficiency who receive...

متن کامل

Citrate Anticoagulation for CRRT in Children: Comparison with Heparin

Regional anticoagulation with citrate is an alternative to heparin in continuous renal replacement therapies, which may prolong circuit lifetime and decrease hemorrhagic complications. A retrospective comparative cohort study based on a prospective observational registry was conducted including critically ill children undergoing CRRT. Efficacy, measured as circuit survival, and secondary effect...

متن کامل

Heparin and anticoagulation.

Heparin, a sulfated polysaccharide, has been used as a clinical anticoagulant for over 90 years. Newer anticoagulants, introduced for certain specialized applications, have not significantly displaced heparin and newer heparin-based anticoagulants in most medical procedures. This chapter, while reviewing anticoagulation and these newer anticoagulants, focuses on heparin-based anticoagulants, in...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
nephro-urology monthly

جلد ۹، شماره ۲، صفحات ۰-۰

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023